Just over a year after the election, we look back at the promises the government made as it came into power and benchmark its progress.
July 16, 2025
One year ago, a Labour government was elected to power in the UK, heralding a positive shift for the renewable energy industry.
Voted into government off the back of a manifesto that centred renewables and pledged rapid solar expansion, the election closed a period during which those in power had, if not actively encouraged, then willingly overseen anti-solar rhetoric and misinformation circulated.
The UK government’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) was quick to take action and in his first week as energy secretary Ed Miliband granted development consent orders (DCOs) for three solar plants with combined capacity over 1.3GW.
One year on, eight solar nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs) have received a DCO from Miliband, most recently giving the nod to Baywa r.e. for the 140MW Oaklands Farm solar-plus-storage development.
Labour’s manifesto pledged to reach 72GW installed solar capacity by 2035, after having tripled solar capacity by 2030 to roughly 42GW.
Focus has shifted away from the 2035 target following the publication of the government’s Clean Power 2030 Action Plan, which details the necessary steps to a majority (98%) renewable energy-powered energy system operating in the UK by 2030. Within this, the government is committed to between 42-47GW solar installed by 2030.
Lead solar analyst for Solar Media Market Research Josh Cornes says that the uptick in solar NSIPs entering the planning system since the election could be the result of improved developer confidence following Miliband’s quick DCO approvals and supportive signals from government, or the CP30 plan pushing them to act sooner than later.
As it promised it would, the government has made changes to the UK planning system to make it harder for local authorities to reject solar developments on spurious grounds.
Previously, wording in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) referenced consideration of agricultural land for food production in considerations for renewable energy project applications, common rhetoric on the anti-solar PV side of the debate and covenient reasoning for solar planning refusals.
The common misconception that solar PV development would lead to food insecurity by taking agricultural land out of commission is one that has been disproven on several counts, including in a statement made by Miliband to the House of Commons in July 2024.
In December, the government implemented a reworded NPPF to state that planning authorities should give “significant weight to the benefits associated with renewable and low carbon energy generation and the proposal’s contribution to a net zero future” when determining applications.
The NPPF is aligned with other phraseology changes the government made to National Policy Statements (NPSs), which cover NSIPs. Adjustments mean that NPS EN-3 calls NSIPs “critical national priority”, and as such their “national security, economic, commercial and net zero benefits” should outweigh negative impacts from their development.
These changes were introduced alongside the CP30 Action Plan, but as as Chris Hewett, chief executive of the UK solar trade body Solar Energy UK and co-chair of the government’s Solar Taskforce, points out, they will not have a major effect on installed generation capacity until after 2030.
The action plan, Hewett says, creates a welcome urgency to build towards a looming target: “More projects came through from our industry because of that.”
When Hewett spoke to PV Tech last year in the wake of the election, he was clear that grid connections were the biggest concern for the industry.
Since then, the UK energy regulator Ofgem approved plans put forward by the National Energy System Operator (NESO), the independent body that manages the UK energy system, including gas, for a new way of managing grid connection applications.
In an effort to cut ‘zombie projects’, those that apply for a grid connection with little chance of ever being realised from the queue, the new system arranges applications into ‘gates’, prioritising projects that are likely to deliver and are aligned with UK-wide energy policy.
According to Hewett, “it’s fair to say it’s been an uncomfortable process”. The new methodology had to be developed very quickly and has been met with some discontent in the solar industry. Hewett says that because government and NESO moved so fast, it has caused economic ripples in the industry, and throughout the process, which was “pretty opaque”, it was not clear that generators’ views were being properly taken into account.
“There are winners and losers out of it as a whole,” he says.
This is another area in which the situation post-2030 has not been discussed. The flip side of the urgency created by CP30, and the speed at which connection reforms have been implemented, is that there are “probably greater question marks over what’s going to happen between 2030 and 2035”.
The rooftop solar sector in the UK has “done well” out of connection reform, Hewett says.
A long-standing ask of the connections process was that the transmission threshold be raised from 1MW to 5MW in England and Wales. In Scotland, the threshold was raised from 50kW to 200kW in summer 2024.
By raising the capacity at which a rooftop installation needs a transmission impact assessment (TIA), which previously slowed or prevented rollout of larger rooftop PV installations, NESO said it hoped to “release around 400 distributed generation projects from having to demonstrate Gate 2 compliance or alignment with Clean Power 2030 targets.”
At the time, Solar Energy UK issued a “warm welcome” to the news that “a burdensome element of red tape that has added many years to getting projects off the ground”, contributing to the government’s stated ambition to “unleash a rooftop revolution”.
The government had pledged in its manifesto to implement a mandate for all newly built properties in the UK to have rooftop PV systems installed. This was a policy that had been floated by the previous government.
However, close to a year after its commitment to the rooftop revolution, the policy that had seemed a sure thing from the off was only made official in June 2025, with the Future Homes Standard to be published in Autumn this year and include the mandate.
Something more in grasp for DESNZ was reform to the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme.
Last year’s auction round six (AR6) broke records for the highest budget (increased by Miliband to £1.56 billion) and capacity secured, with 3.3GW solar projects receiving contracts (out of a total 34.74GW awarded). Shortly after the success of last year’s auction, the government announced ambition to reform the process for an even bigger capacity in AR7.
To meet CP30 targets, at least 12GW capacity will need to be secured in AR7, AR8 and potentially (depending on speed of deployment) AR9 across all technologies. For its speed to deploy and comparably low cost (in comparison with other technology types included in the auction) much of this could be met by solar projects.
Changes to the scheme approved on 15 July 2025 include increasing the length of contracts available for wind and solar projects from 15 up to 20 years and allowing the energy secretary to view developer bids ahead of setting the final budget.
This move gives more forward certainty to industry as to what application rounds will look like for the projects set to be delivered by 2030, something that has been well received.
The flagship Great British Energy company could play a role in smaller-scale solar.
Hewett notes that on the launch of GB Energy, the solar industry’s advice was that the investment vehicle-stroke-renewable energy developer use some of the £8.3 billion it is allotted to invest in the public sector—“which is exactly what they’ve done”.
A £200 million investment from the UK government and GB Energy will see the company work with schools and the NHS to install rooftop solar PV on a total of 400 sites, delivering between 70MW and 100MW of solar generation.
In England around £80 million in funding will support around 200 schools, alongside £100 million for nearly 200 NHS sites, with the first solar systems to be installed by the end of summer 2025.
A more recent development in the company’s remit is an amendment to the Great British Energy Bill that sets an obligation to ban the use of solar products with forced labour in their supply chains in its projects.
It will also find opportunities to develop technology sovereignty in the supply chain to drive the concept of energy engineered in the UK that backs the recently released Industrial Strategy.
Perhaps the government's Solar Roadmap, detailing how it will meet installed capacity targets, was the most keenly awaited and slowest to deliver promise. Soon after the election, Miliband re-called the Solar Taskforce, co-chairing the group with Hewett as a signifier of the emphasis he placed on its mission.
Hewett says that “you can’t fault the ambition” in the speed at which Miliband moved, with the Roadmap first promised for autumn 2024, after a shift to reflect the new government’s increased ambition and one month after its first meeting in September 2024.
Ensuring alignment with the CP30 Action Plan delayed this, and Hewett concedes that Miliband wasn’t able to be “as hands on” with the taskforce as he would have liked.
However, with the government’s first Spending Review confirming its economic commitment to renewable energy development, the Solar Roadmap has at long last been published—with not an insignificant amount of focus on the supply chain issues.
This is an excerpt from an article that will be published in the upcoming issue of PV Tech Power, available with a premium subscription to either PV Tech or Energy Storage News. The journal also features an in-depth look at the Solar Roadmap by Chris Hewett.
You May Also Like
.jpg?width=700&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale)
.png?width=700&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale "Energy Storage Summit 2026")